đ Welcome
Welcome to the Statement and Syllogism Venn Diagram Visualiser! This educational platform helps you learn and understand categorical logic through interactive Venn diagrams. Whether you're studying basic propositions or complex syllogistic arguments, this tool provides visual representations to enhance your understanding.
đ Two Operating Modes
The platform offers two modes accessible via the toggle switch at the top:
- Statement Mode: For analyzing single categorical propositions (A, E, I, O types) with two-circle Venn diagrams
- Syllogism Mode: For analyzing categorical syllogisms with three-circle Venn diagrams, including validity checking and formal proving
đĄ Tip: Start with Statement Mode to understand basic propositions before moving to Syllogism Mode.
đ Categorical Proposition Types
There are four standard forms of categorical propositions:
| Type |
Name |
Form |
Subject |
Predicate |
| A |
Universal Affirmative |
All S are P |
Distributed |
Undistributed |
| E |
Universal Negative |
No S are P |
Distributed |
Distributed |
| I |
Particular Affirmative |
Some S are P |
Undistributed |
Undistributed |
| O |
Particular Negative |
Some S are not P |
Undistributed |
Distributed |
Distribution: A term is distributed when the proposition makes a claim about ALL members of that category. Badges show D for distributed and xD for undistributed.
đ Syllogistic Figures
A syllogism's figure is determined by the position of the Middle Term (M) in the premises:
| Figure |
Major Premise |
Minor Premise |
Pattern |
| Figure 1 |
M - P |
S - M |
Middle is subject of major, predicate of minor |
| Figure 2 |
P - M |
S - M |
Middle is predicate of both |
| Figure 3 |
M - P |
M - S |
Middle is subject of both |
| Figure 4 |
P - M |
M - S |
Middle is predicate of major, subject of minor |
đ¯ How to Use the Platform
Step 1: Enter Propositions
- In Statement Mode: Enter subject and predicate terms for a single premise
- In Syllogism Mode: Enter terms for both premises (the system requires exactly 3 unique terms)
- Select quantifiers (ALL/SOME) and copulas (IS/IS NOT) from dropdowns
- The conclusion terms are automatically populated from your premises
Step 2: Select Conclusion Terms
- Choose the subject and predicate for your conclusion from the dropdown menus
- The system will automatically identify Major, Minor, and Middle terms
- Premise labels update to show which is the Major Premise and which is the Minor Premise
Step 3: Check Validity (Syllogism Mode)
- Click "Check Validity" to determine if your syllogism is valid
- Results show the mood-figure code (e.g., AAA-1), traditional name (e.g., Barbara), and validity status
- Green = Unconditionally Valid, Yellow = Conditionally Valid (Aristotelian), Red = Invalid
Step 4: Use the Proving Table
- Manually test each validity rule by selecting YES/NO in the Answer column
- Or click "System Proving" to have the system automatically check all rules
- Any NO answer indicates a fallacy (shown in the Fallacy column)
đ¨ Using the Venn Diagram Canvas
- Select color and drag to regions for coloring (shading represents empty areas)
- Drag circles to reposition them
- Drag circle edges to resize circles
- Add Existence markers (X) to indicate that members exist in a region
- Toggle Boolean/Aristotelian to switch between logical systems
- Use the color palette to select different colors for shading
- Use "Clear All Colors" to reset the diagram
â ī¸ Note: The Premises Diagram and Conclusion Diagram are separate canvases. Changes to one do not affect the other.
â
Syllogism Validity Rules
A valid syllogism must satisfy ALL of the following rules:
| Rule |
Requirement |
Fallacy if Violated |
| Three Terms |
Exactly three distinct terms used consistently |
Fallacy of Four Terms |
| Middle Term Distribution |
Middle term must be distributed at least once |
Undistributed Middle |
| Conclusion Distribution |
Terms distributed in conclusion must be distributed in premises |
Illicit Major/Minor |
| Exclusive Premises |
Cannot have two negative premises |
Fallacy of Exclusive Premises |
| Negative Matches |
Negative premise requires negative conclusion; affirmative premises require affirmative conclusion |
Drawing wrong quality conclusion |
| Existential Rule |
Particular conclusion from universal premises requires existential assumption |
Existential Fallacy |
đ Web Search Feature
The Web Search section allows you to quickly search for more information about syllogistic forms:
- The search query automatically updates based on the current validity check result
- Click "Search" to open a Google search in a new tab
- You can modify the search query before searching
â¨ī¸ Tips & Best Practices
- Use consistent terminology when entering terms (case-insensitive)
- The system automatically detects E-type propositions and shows the alternative "No S is P" notation
- Resize the left panel by dragging the divider for more workspace
- Use the Reset button to clear all inputs and start fresh
- Check the Knowledge Table at the bottom for quick reference to proposition types and figures
âšī¸ About
Designer
LAM Wai Ip æčĻč (HKU)
Developer
Claude-Opus 4.5 (Anthropic)
đ License & Citation
This application is provided free of charge for educational and research purposes.
If you use this application in your research or teaching, please cite:
Lam, W. I. (2026). Statement and Syllogism Venn Diagram Visualiser.